Learning Styles # 3 Peter Honey and Alan Mumford's Model

 

 

Peter Honey and Alan Mumford adapted Kolb's experiential learning model. First, they renamed the stages in the learning cycle to accord with managerial experiences: having an experience, reviewing the experience, concluding from the experience, and planning the next steps. Second, they aligned these stages to four learning styles named.




1.   Activist

2.   Reflector

3.   Theorist

4.   Pragmatist


These learning styles are not innate to an individual but rather are developed based on an individual's experiences and preferences. Based on this model, the Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) was developed to allow individuals to assess and reflect on how they consume information and learn from their experiences. It serves as an alternative to Kolb's LSI as it directly asks about common behaviors found in the workplace compared to judging how an individual learns. Having completed the self-assessment, managers are encouraged to focus on strengthening underutilized styles in order to become better equipped to learn from a wide range of everyday experiences. A MORI survey commissioned by The Campaign for Learning in 1999 found the Honey and Mumford LSQ to be the most widely used system for assessing preferred learning styles in the local government sector in the UK.


Learning modalities


Walter Burke Barbe and colleagues proposed three learning modalities (often identified by the acronym VAK).

1.   Visualizing modality

2.   Auditory modality

3.   Kinesthetic modality


Descriptions of learning modalities

Visual

Kinesthetic/tactile

Auditory

Picture

Gestures

Listening

Shape

Body movements

Rhythms

Sculpture

Object manipulation

Tone

Paintings

Positioning

Chants

Barbe and colleagues reported that learning modality strengths can occur independently or in combination (although the most frequent modality strengths, according to their research, are visual or mixed), they can change over time, and they become integrated with age. They also pointed out that learning modality strengths are different from preferences; a person's self-reported modality preference may not correspond to their empirically measured modality strength This disconnect between strengths and preferences was confirmed by a subsequent study. Nevertheless, some scholars have criticized the VAK model Psychologist Scott Lilienfeld and colleagues have argued that much use of the VAK model is nothing more than pseudoscience or a psychological urban legend.

 

List of References

Vasquez, Kris (2009). "Learning styles as self-fulfilling prophecies". In Gurung, Regan A. R.; Prieto, Loreto R. (eds.). Getting culture: incorporating diversity across the curriculum. Sterling, VA: Stylus. pp. 53–63.

Pritchard, Alan (2014) [2005]. "Learning styles"Ways of learning: learning theories and learning styles in the classroom (3rd ed.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge. pp. 46–65. 

Comments

  1. Honey and Mumford's adaptation of Kolb's experiential learning model demonstrates a keen understanding of the unique challenges and dynamics present in managerial contexts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The four different ways in which people prefer to learn that Honey and Mumford have identified, relate to a different stage in the learning cycle.

      Delete
  2. Fascinating breakdown of Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles model! Their adaptation of Kolb's model sheds light on how individuals approach learning based on their experiences and managerial roles. The practical application of their LSQ offers valuable insights for personal and professional development. Looking forward to exploring more on how these styles shape learning strategies!

    ReplyDelete
  3. A nice article on Peter Honey and Alan Mumford's adapted model of Kolb's experiential learning model. The identification of the four different ways employees like to learn help to develop the learning cycles in an organization effectively.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for the summary of Peter Honey and Alan Mumford's learning styles model and the VAK learning modalities! It's fascinating to see how they've adapted Kolb's experiential learning model for managerial experiences. Their concept of different learning styles provides valuable insights into individual approaches to learning. The Learning Styles Questionnaire they developed seems like a practical tool for self-assessment and improvement. However, it's worth noting the criticism surrounding some models like VAK, highlighting ongoing debates in the field of learning styles.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Training and Development

What are the Business Benefits to Operate Learning Organization