Learning Styles #2 David Kolb's Model
David
A. Kolb's model is based on his experiential learning model, as
explained in his book Experiential Learning. Kolb's model outlines
two related approaches toward grasping experience: Concrete Experience and Abstract
Conceptualization, as well as two related approaches toward transforming
experience: Reflective Observation and Active
Experimentation. According to Kolb's model, the ideal
learning process engages all four of these modes in response to situational
demands; they form a learning cycle from experience to observation to
conceptualization to experimentation and back to experience. In order for
learning to be effective, Kolb postulated, all four of these approaches must be
incorporated. As individuals attempt to use all four approaches, they may tend
to develop strengths in one experience-grasping approach and one
experience-transforming approach, leading them to prefer one of the following
four learning styles
1.
Accommodator
= Concrete Experience + Active Experiment: strong in
"hands-on" practical doing (e.g., physical therapists)
2.
Converger
= Abstract Conceptualization + Active Experiment: strong in
practical "hands-on" application of theories (e.g., engineers)
3.
Diverger
= Concrete Experience + Reflective Observation: strong in
imaginative ability and discussion (e.g., social workers)
4.
Assimilator
= Abstract Conceptualization + Reflective Observation: strong in
inductive reasoning and creation of theories (e.g., philosophers)
Kolb's
model gave rise to the Learning Style Inventory, an assessment method used to
determine an individual's learning style. According to this model, individuals
may exhibit a preference for one of the four styles—Accommodating, Converging,
Diverging and Assimilating—depending on their approach to learning in Kolb's
experiential learning model.
Although
Kolb's model is widely used, a 2013 study pointed out that Kolb's Learning
Style Inventory, among its other weaknesses, incorrectly dichotomizes
individuals on the abstract/concrete and reflective/action dimensions of
experiential learning (in much the same way as the Myers-Briggs Type
Indicator does in a different context), and proposed instead that these
dimensions be treated as continuous rather than dichotomous/binary variables.
In
an article that addressed Kolb's work through 2005, Mark K. Smith reviewed some
critiques of Kolb's model, and identified six key issues regarding the model.
1.
The
model doesn't adequately address the process of reflection;
2.
The
claims it makes about the four learning styles are extravagant;
3.
It
doesn't sufficiently address the fact of different cultural conditions and
experiences;
4.
The
idea of stages/steps doesn't necessarily match reality;
5.
It
has only weak empirical evidence;
6.
The
relationship between learning processes and knowledge is more complex than Kolb
draws it.
Source: YouTube
List of References
Smith,
Mark K. (2010). "David
A. Kolb on experiential learning". infed.org. Retrieved 9 August 2015.
Understanding and embracing these preferred learning styles can enhance the effectiveness of educational and training initiatives, enabling individuals to optimize their learning experiences and achieve meaningful growth.
ReplyDeleteFour phases make up David Kolb's experiential learning model: active experimentation, abstract conceptualization, reflective observation, and concrete experience. Critics counter that it ignores the impact of individual characteristics and cultural influences and oversimplifies learning methods. Furthermore, the non-linear character of learning is not taken into consideration by its linear growth. As a result, it could result in a poor instructional design that falls short of meeting the various learning demands of students.
ReplyDeleteKolb's experiential learning model offers a fascinating perspective on how individuals engage with and transform experiences. The breakdown of learning styles, from 'Accommodator' to 'Assimilator,' sheds light on diverse approaches to learning. Excited to delve deeper into how these styles influence our learning journey!
ReplyDeleteNice article! David Kolb's model provides a structured approach to enhance learning and development. Start by engaging learners in concrete experiences relevant to the topic at hand. Then, encourage reflective observation, where learners analyze their experiences and identify patterns or insights. Next, facilitate abstract conceptualization by helping learners draw conclusions and create theories based on their observations. Finally, promote active experimentation, where learners apply their newfound knowledge in real-world situations and reflect on the outcomes. By incorporating Kolb's model into training programs, organizations can foster experiential learning and facilitate continuous growth and development among employees.
ReplyDeleteThe four learning styles—Accommodator, Converger, Diverger, and Assimilator—offer us a glimpse into the varying learning preferences of individuals. Nonetheless, some detractors contend that the approach is overly straightforward and devoid of solid data.
ReplyDelete